Obama to Issue Own Health Care Reform Plan on Feb. 22

0

Category : Federal Labor Law

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

The administration has announced that Barack Obama will issue his own health care reform plan on Monday, Feb. 22.

However, since Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius said Obama's "one proposal" will feature "some of the best ideas" from the House and Senate plans, this can only mean his proposal will be a blank piece of paper.

There were zero "best ideas" in either the House or Senate measures. In fact, there weren't even any "faintly good" ideas in either plan. Just more government, more government control, and less individual choice or freedom.

However, what this announcement really means is the re-emergence of the so-called socialist public option and a rush to reconciliation after trying to shame the Republican opposition at the Feb. 25 health care summit.

Whether we want it or not, and 60-plus percent of us don't, one way or the other we'll have Obamacare shoved down our throats.

Canadian Premier Williams Rejects His Nation’s Health Care System

0

Category : Random Musings

After touting the beauty of single-payer (read: socialist) health care in Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams has secreted himself off to locations unknown in the United States to undergo a heart procedure, reportedly open-heart surgery.

Some reports claim the procedure was not available in Williams's home province; others aren't sure. However, clearly someone in Canada performs heart procedures for those who can't afford to go south of the border and are stuck with Canada's version of Obamacare. However, quality and waiting time are always huge factors in our northern neighbor's delivery system.

A few things shade this whole episode in gray if not downright darkness. First, Williams tried to hide the fact of his trip south for surgery. Second, it seems blatantly hypocritical for a staunch defender of CanadaCare to secretly opt for the obviously "lesser quality" (according to pro-Canada people like Williams) health care system in America. Third, it's not even clear if Williams is the payer or if the Canadian public is.

Which is why I've said all along, should Obamacare pass, the nation will face a two-tiered medical system: one for the public that's as awful as Canada's, and one for Obama and his cronies that retains all the glory and qualify of the privatized system we all currently enjoy.

Secret Pelosi-Reid Deal on Obamacare, USSR Style?

0

Category : Federal Labor Law

Word is going around that, despite all the talk about paring back health care reform and involving Republicans, the Democrats are secretly hatching a deal for the House to pass the Senate version and then for the Senate, using the reconciliation process that precludes filibusters, to approve amendments to overcome House objections–to wit, restore the public option and gut any abortion restrictions.

Voila, the Scott Brown 41st vote against health care reform is thereby nullified.

The only question remaining about this deal between Politburo Chief Nancy Pelosi and Communist Party Chief Harry Reid is one of timing.

That is, will they wait until Brown is seated, or will they strike now?

My question: If they're going to do it, does it matter when? Probably the quicker, the better, if the Dems want to survive in power come November.

With Health Care Costs Down, Time for Govt. to Screw Things Up

0

Category : Federal Labor Law

health care spending With Health Care Costs Down, Time for Govt. to Screw Things UpHealth care costs have been ameliorating, annual increase-wise, since 2002, with 2008 showing an increase of just 4.4 percent, the lowest in 50 years.

So how does the government react? It comes up with a plan to raise everyone's premiums by mandating coverage for all people, regardless of age, health or pre-existing conditions. Now, of course, it's ideal that everyone be covered, but what the Democrats cover up don't talk about is that it's more expensive to cover everyone, and someone has to pay.

They can hide some of the cost increases through deficit spending and hidden taxes (on the so-called wealthy or on "Cadillac health plans"), but ultimately the costs all rebound to the users, either in terms of higher insurance premiums (guaranteed under Obamacare), longer waits for treatment and medicines (ditto), or flat-out rationing (ditto redux).

Look for all three if so-called health care reform passes.

Doomed Medicare Advantage Works Better Than Parent

0

Category : Random Musings

Admittedly, the group compiling the data and the findings is a health insurance trade organization, but according to its culling of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) findings, the program Obama wants to cut–Medicare Advantage–far surpasses regular Medicare in results:

Seniors in Medicare Advantage spent fewer days in a hospital, were subject to fewer hospital re-admissions, and were less likely to have “potentially avoidable” admissions, for common conditions ranging from uncontrolled diabetes to dehydration, according to a new analysis of publicly available AHRQ data released today by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP).

In other words, Obama will pay for “health care for all” by cutting health care for seniors. No wonder they’re up in arms.

Heresy! A Liberal Criticizes Obamacare?

0

Category : Random Musings

Can you imagine a self-avowed liberal calling parts of the House of Representatives’ health reform measure (HR 3200) “ghoulish” and “creepy.”

Granted, Deborah White doesn’t go so far (or as accurately, right, Zeke Emanuel?) as to predict the establishment of “death panels” down the road, but she does pinpoint some of the really onerous, unctuous and terrifying parts of Obamacare (which HR 3200 most nearly resembles).

Read “Democrats Must Dump Incentives from Health Care Reform.”

Obama to Us: Health Care Reform=No Health Care

0

Category : Uncategorized

Dear Mr. and Ms. Patient,

It has come to my attention that in order for you to enjoy success as patients in the new era of health care reform, you must start working now to prevent illnesses that might befall you. Do not, under any circumstances, eat or drink too much. Fast food might as well be considered illegal. Exercise three, four, five times a day, even if it means taking time off from work. It goes without saying that you should not smoke. The government has data that demonstrates how you have become fat, lazy, and a huge burden on our healthcare system. Your non-compliance threatens the very fiber of our economy. Even employers realize this, and are using calculators to figure your financial burden to them.

Now, in the unfortunate circumstance where you might become sick, you will need to develop symptoms that follow a few simple rules. Do not, under any circumstances, develop symptoms that fall outside federal protocols developed based on comparative effectiveness research data. If you do, your doctors will face pay cuts, litigation, limited resources due to lack of funding for cost-ineffective technologies, and the scourge of discharge planners. Does the term “leper colony” mean anything to you?

Rest assured, if you fall into one of the areas studied under the guise of comparative effectiveness research and I apply all of the 153 quality care measures deemed necessary, according to the President I will not receive a cut in pay and you will receive exemplary care. Further, my nurse coordinator will be more than happy to answer your calls, see you in the hospital, answer all your questions and service your symptoms. After all, Mr. Peter F. Orszag, an economist and Director of the Congressional Budget Office, feels they are equivalent to my specialist care and will serve as “productivity enhancements,” saving $110 billion. See how patriotic you’ll be?

Also, do not be a surgical case that has any risk of failure. After all, “Complicated Patient” is the new scarlet letter as we work to cut even more costs. Fortunately, thanks to the new multitudes of guidelines for care that we must follow, I will be carefully interviewing you to assure that you fit into one of several pre-determined renumeration bins called “bundles.” Please don’t confuse me with more than one major disease since there is currently no way to handle this circumstance. I would suggest you pick the disease that bothers you most.

Unfortunately, after years of clinical practice I have observed several clever patient stunts, like failure to respond to medications, unusual unforeseen infections, having a rare disease, and the like. I strongly recommend against these shenanigans as we move forward. It is in your best interest to not require long hospital stays, dear patient, or else.

I wish you the best as we move forward in this exciting time. Please feel free to contact my automated pool of nurse coordinators if you have questions. They’ll each open your message, play a little “hot potato” with each other, and then contact you as our information technology system streamlines communication.

Stay healthy!

Sincerely,

Dr. Wes

News to Obamacrats: Health Costs Are Rising Faster in Massachusetts

0

Category : Random Musings

Now that we have the Democrats rushing to shove health care reform down our throats whether we need it or not, they could at least make a plausible case for doing so. Instead, they keep flinging unsubstantiated promises our way, and the biggest, most unsubstantiated, fly-in-the-face-of-reality promise of them all is that they’re going to reduce health care costs. It would be nice if they said how and did so in a rational way.

First, adding all currently uninsured Americans to the health care rolls certainly doesn’t cost nothing, nor does it somehow magically reduce costs elsewhere. It might make emergency rooms a saner place to visit, but every sniffling nose suddenly being rushed to a doctor’s office isn’t exactly free. Nor are those aches and pains that people got accustomed to living through with drug-store preparations that will now end up in a doctor’s office visitation.

Second, all we have to do is examine the model after which Kennebaucusbama is designing our health care system–Massachusetts’ Commonwealth Care–which is already going financially bust after just a couple of years. In fact, the state is expanding the number of people who get exemptions from purchasing health insurance (the much-vaunted individual mandate) so it can save money in subsidies. Meanwhile, it’s impossible to see a doctor unless you’re willing to wait, and wait…and wait (provided you had a doctor pre-Commonwealth Care).

Did the cost of health care go down somehow even as the state’s expenditures for it doubled? The answer is in the question, obviously. How about health insurance premiums? Down as promised? Let’s listen to Michael D. Tanner of the Cato Institute (admittedly a conservative group):

Proponents promised the reforms would reduce health care costs, suggesting the price of individual insurance policies would be reduced by 25-40 percent. In reality, however, insurance premiums rose by 7.4 percent in 2007, 8-12 percent in 2008, and are expected to rise 9 percent this year. This is compared to a nationwide average increase of 5.7 percent over the same three years. Nationally, on average, health insurance for a family of four costs $12,700; in Massachusetts, coverage for the same family costs an average of $16,897. [My note: It is an expensive place to live overall.]

I can hear the Kennebaucusbama rejoinder now: “That’s because it’s only a state. When we do it nationwide, the true savings with kick in as we factor in the uninsured young and healthy. Staying with the status quo is clearly a false option.” (I just had to throw in that gas-bag “false option” phrase because it’s, well, a bunch of hot air designed to shut off debate and deny Republicans a say in the process).

If they were going to be truthful, the Obamacrats could say: “Listen, this ain’t gonna be cheap, and let’s face it, there are only a few ways to bring down costs. We can insure fewer people, we can pay providers less, or we can deny and ration services. Period. Which do you prefer?”

The status quo.

Coming Soon to Your Sick Bed: The DMV

0

Category : Federal Labor Law, Random Musings

Or the INS (then, or now as the USCIS) or the IRS or the Post Office….

It’s KennedyCare, Ted’s take on so-called health care reform, which is really just control reform since the only thing the feds are targeting is how health care is paid for–and ultimately how much is paid for it and how much of it is not paid for (the dreaded “R” word that no Democrat will utter–rationing).

Kennedy is set to unveil his reform module on Monday, and it’s everything a person who loves government will adore–it’s the rapid march to nationalized medicine and the perhaps even more rapid demise of quality health care. Mainly, it’s just the failed Commonwealth Care program that is strangling Massachusetts’ finances and destroying access to doctors and hospitals.

Former GE chief Jack Welch, who lives in Massachusetts, was asked on CNBC what people in the state thought of their new health care system, and he said, in effect, “They all love government, and they’re all drinking the same kool-aid.”

Kennedy is adamant, according to sources, on creating a federal health insurance option, which is, of course, the Trojan Horse needed to kill off private health insurance so that all that’s left standing is one of the great government failures of all time, Medicare (which singlehandedly created the mess we’re in right now).

People who love government will love KennedyCare. The trick now is to hide the costs for those of us who don’t drink the kool-aid, or maybe they just don’t care. Us teetotalers don’t really matter, now do we?

For All of You Who Think Health Care Reform=Free Care, Read On

4

Category : Federal Labor Law, Random Musings

interactive map For All of You Who Think Health Care Reform=Free Care, Read On

Click on Image for Interactive Map

I just read a polling result that said three out of four Americans now favor health care reform. That’s all well and good, but I bet you that at least three of every four who said they favored reform also believed that it meant they would soon be getting health care for free, or that Obama would somehow find a way to soak the rich to pay for everyone else. You know, Obama waves his magic wand, and soon you can just walk into the doctor’s office and walk out with free treatment and free medicine, or you you can just check into the hospital, get all fixed up and never hear from their accounting department.

I’d say that the vast majority of those favorable respondents to the poll are going to be rudely awakened under “reformed” health care when they find they must buy the insurance themselves or, if they get it at work, pay taxes on it as income. Plus, they’ll be shocked when they’re told by some faceless bureaucrat in D.C. that the service or medicine they want isn’t cost effective and thus they can’t have it.

Anyway, without tackling doctors and hospitals and putting them on restricted, set budgets, there’s no way anyone in D.C. can make health care as we know it “affordable.” It’s all a big hoax (unless you’re on Medicaid because you’re dirt poor, then it’s both “affordable” and ”free”).

 The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, a massive study of health care in every region of the country, tracked Medicare costs per patient per city and region over time. The researchers found that, in areas with more hospitals and more specialized testing facilities, physicians ordered more tests, jacking up the costs often needlessly. In contrast, in areas (rural, etc.) where there was no glut of test facilities, costs went down while residents often got better care.

Sure enough, by doing away with both duplicative and needless tests and office visits, you can begin to lower costs around the country, or at least even them all out, but this is where that faceless bureaucrat comes in: Someone has to dictate what can’t and can’t be done and what will and won’t be paid for, or doctors and patients will continue to avail themselves of everything at their disposal.

That’s the dirty little “R” word that no one dare utter in D.C.–rationing. It’s the lynchpin, obviously, of any nationalized health reform; everything sinks without it.

Anyway, the Dartmouth Project is interesting to study. There’s a link to the text explanation in the title above, and you can click on the map image to open up an interactive tool to compare health care costs region by region and city by city. A good way to while away some idle time at work anyway, so go for it.