Death Panels Live, Pardon the Pun

0

Category : Random Musings

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

A thoughtful article over at the Cato Institute Web site by Alan Reynolds exposes the smear campaign against Sarah Palin and her observation about "death panels."

The smear involved linking her comment to the language for "end-of-life counseling" in the House health care reform package, when in fact Palin was referring to the overall end result of such reform.

Her words: "Government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course."

Palin's comments were more directed toward trusted Obama health care adviser Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel than they were to the House measure. Emmanuel is a longtime advocate for rationing health care primarily to people aged 15 to 45 and letting the young and the old fend for themselves. (Which is basically Hitlerian, but if you mention that, you get the Palin treatment by the traditional media.)

The moral of all this, besides the obvious manipulation of truth by the media, is that we "useless eaters" (thank you, Adolph, for the term) need to unite and defeat Obamacare, but I fear we may be too late. We already opened the hen house door and let the fox(es) in by thinking the Democrats could produce the world's first universal free lunch.

Now we have to pay for it.

Oakland Cops Get 130 Vacation Hours and Back Pay for Unpaid ‘Donning and Doffing’ Time

0

Category : Random Musings

You gotta wonder who was more out to lunch, the cops who thought they needed overtime for dressing and undressing for work or the judge who agreed with them?

Anyway, Oakland's pigs so-called finest are now being paid $3,500 each, along with 130 hours of vacation time, for not having been compensated for putting their uniforms on and off. Another $1.75 million goes to the union for extortion legal fees.

Does that mean if I'm required to wear a long-sleeved dress shirt and tie to work that I should get paid for "donning and doffing" time?

"Hey, boss, you know the cops get paid for dressing for work," I intone right before he hands me my pink slip.

Remember, this is on the taxpayer's dime to boot.

Skyscraper Index: ‘World’s Tallest’ Curse Fells Dubai; Who’s Next?

0

Category : Random Musings

As buildings set new records for height, economies tend to set new records the other way. This is known as the Skyscraper Index.

The completion of the Empire State Building in 1932, then the world's tallest building, signaled the onset of the Great Depression. In 1973, the completion of the Sears Tower marked a two-year, 45-percent plunge in U.S. stocks.

In 1997, Malaysia's Petronas Towers surged skyward to become the "world's tallest building," and the Malaysian stock market tanked 50 percent in gratitude.

Now Dubai, with its construction of the "world's largest building," the Burj Dubai, sees its economy in the gutter and the owner of the building in default on billions in notes.

Shanghai is tempting fate with the construction of the world's second highest skyscraper, set to open in 2014. Will China tank that year?

The Koreans are aiming to complete the world's tallest twin skyscrapers, the Incheon Towers, in 2015, so a Chinese crash could ripple eastward and take South Korea in its wake.

Don't tempt fate with the world's biggest, tallest, largest or whatever, argues speculator Victor Niederhoffer in his book Practical Speculation.

He cites the example of the Nasdaq's MarketSite tower, which featured the world's largest video display when it opened in December 1999; in short order the Nasdaq composite plunged 70 percent.

The Saudis are also tempting fate by constructing a complex called the Abraj Al-Bait Towers in Mecca, which will lay claim to being the world's largest building in terms of floor space when it opens next year.

You've heard of "dead pools," where bets are placed on which famous person will go next. Maybe we need a "Skyscraper Pool" too, though it might prove to be too predictable.

The Cost of Regulation in California in One Word: Ouch!

0

Category : State Labor Law

The Governator of California commissioned a study on the cost and impact of regulations in the Golden State, but so far no one is Sacramento is the least bit concerned about it since doing anything it proposes would cost the pols union support and donations–and also force them to govern responsibly.

In dollar terms, regulatory costs amount per year to $492,994 billion, or roughly five times the state's budget and one-third the size of the entire economy. In human terms, regulations kill of 3.8 million jobs–and this in a state with 12 percent unemployment!

It was no fly-by-night study either, done by Varshney and Associates of El Dorado Hills.

But as I said, don't expect any Democrats–and few Republicans–to do anything about it.

More details here.